tanagram partners

(3) Aug 1, 2004

Comments

GravatarOn August 5, 2004 9:05 AM Michael Pierce said:

Overall design has a nice layout and good use of imagery. Overuse of very small fonts, though.

Also, for a "CSS" site, why are all of the hover effects accomplished with javascript instead of :hover? Really makes the markup messy!

GravatarOn August 6, 2004 5:40 AM paul haine said:

Mmm, it does look pretty good. I'd agree with Michael about the messy markup, though, and I'm also not convinced by the use of Helvetica as the primary font.

More of a problem for me, though...how do you get back to the front page? Once I've started clicking around, I found it to be impossible, and as all of this is just one single page, it means the back button does nothing when I expected it to...

GravatarOn August 6, 2004 5:43 AM paul haine said:

Ah, I found the way back to the front bit - you click the little logo on the left.

Post a comment

Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.

  • Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
  • Personal attacks will be deleted.
  • Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.

Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.

Gravatars are enabled.

Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)

Resources Worth Checking

Recent Forum Discussions

About CSS Beauty

CSSBEAUTY™ is a project focused on providing its audience with a database of well designed CSS based websites from around the world.

Its purpose is to showcase designers' work and to act as a portal to the CSS design community.