Comments
On December 27, 2004 2:52 PM Woelfle said:Very good design! I think it's very beauty, similar and useful! And it almost doesn't use JavaScript :D
On December 27, 2004 4:54 PM Preston said:Although the site IS supposed to feel like a "hot potato," it's TOO potato-like. The two icons in the top right corner are very cryptic; I spent quite a long time figuring out what they were for.
On December 28, 2004 4:49 AM Rafa Garcia said:The site gives no problem until you discover those control icons for increasing-decreasing sizes....the moment you press a button, the moment you lose total control or the website.
Besides, i find the general palette of colors not contrasted, it all becomes too brown, hard to read.
The final result could be improved in my opinion.
On December 30, 2004 8:51 AM joos said:Nice design and something new. Colourscheme is pretty yuk!
On December 31, 2004 8:23 AM Elliot Toman said:I'm divided over this site. On one hand, the three-column design means that (in my opinion) they either waste space on a page or try to fit too much info at once. The brown shades--which this firm seems to have a taste for, given their client sites--are a little bit dreary because they're so pervasive. On the other hand, though, I really like the use of vector graphics and the overall cohesiveness of the design.
On January 5, 2005 4:54 PM Nate said:I like the idea but really dislike the color scheme as well as the organization. I just find it really hard to see whats going on and where to go.
On October 8, 2005 10:00 PM mojaam said:I am loving the forms. How they highlight when active.
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.