Comments
On July 22, 2005 9:40 AM Sarah said:A fantastic redesign, great look & feel and easy to navigate.
On July 22, 2005 10:10 AM A* said:Fantastic. Clean & Simple, yet extremely elegant. Lovin' the reflections and gloss look, and the copy highlights are good too!
On July 22, 2005 10:22 AM Peter G. said:Very nice, but why use sIFR for Trebuchet? You’ve said yourself in the colophon that it comes preinstalled on my computer. So why the need for sIFR? That point aside, You’ve done a nice job.
On July 22, 2005 10:29 AM sam said:I like the site, the navigation looks excelent. However there appear to be some issues with display in firefox - the titles are all bunched together and unreadable.
I do like the use of yellow.
atb S
On July 22, 2005 12:05 PM Kerorin said:/Me likes very much!
And yes, sIFR for Trebuchet is a bit weird but everything else is stellar: love the logo, colours, structure. The three big buttons for main sections are a nice idea.
On July 22, 2005 1:50 PM Thame said:Peter G.
I think the designer used sIFR because of the AA. If you are using Windows without any font smoothing, some fonts can get a little ugly.
On July 22, 2005 2:01 PM Stewart Curry said:Hi everyone and thanks for the comments!
Thame is right, I'm using sIFR for the headings so that they're anti-aliased on Windows for those people who don't have font smoothing on.
I also wanted to try it out on my site to see if it worked before using it on paying clients!
I could have used graphics, but I prefer the idea of having the "hX" tags as text that I can edit on the fly.
It'll also allow me to use alternate stylesheets down the line.
Thanks again for the kind words!
On July 22, 2005 4:26 PM Preston said:Fantastic site. The navigation lags behind a bit on computers with Internet Explorer 6 - probably because of IE's inability to preload images and replace images using its memory. The graphics are great but the color scheme is relatively dull. It might be good to spruce it up with brighter colors.
On July 23, 2005 5:33 AM kevadamson said:Tidy.
What's with the yellow? I find it interferes with the design rather than actively highlighting areas.
Logo : a little overly worked(?) - I dunno, I'm nit-picking. Congrats on a good site though ...
On July 23, 2005 7:15 AM ct_roy said:you have outdone yourself! looks great man.
On July 23, 2005 9:59 AM Eoghan McCabe said:Very nice design. Code doesn't validate though.
On July 23, 2005 11:41 AM Mark said:Nice design, butt in Opera 7.54 the menu is messed up.
It do not display "inline", so the hole design is also messed up.
Looks great is firefox and ie
On August 6, 2005 6:39 PM Jay said:Nice and crips. Nice navigation... Even though I hate black, this site is different. Still, something is a miss. Maybe the yellow highlights. Very nice though over all!
On August 10, 2005 8:56 AM nq said:I like colors! :)
best regards
nq
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.