Oklahoma Wesleyan University

Oklahoma Wesleyan University

(12) Posted by Alex Giron on Jun 3, 2005

Comments

GravatarOn June 3, 2005 7:28 PM Joshua Kendall said:

Wow, love the colors. Easy to navigate and on the eyes as well.

Good pick, and good job.

GravatarOn June 3, 2005 8:23 PM Freddy said:

So where's the link text of the "meet us" boxes gone? Follow the underline they forgot to unset.

GravatarOn June 3, 2005 8:26 PM Joshua Kendall said:

I just noticed a line across the "meet us" area.

GravatarOn June 3, 2005 8:26 PM PR said:

Just a quick comment to the site's author: In firefox (PC), there's a blue line about half way down the page that cuts through the faces of "Mitch", "Julie" etc. It's not on IE, so something funny going on...

Nice site though!

GravatarOn June 3, 2005 8:27 PM Joshua Kendall said:

Yeah, that's what I am using (Firefox), guess I should of mentioned that.

GravatarOn June 4, 2005 1:07 AM clint said:

well done indeed, I like the organization of content, alot to work with and handled well...

GravatarOn June 4, 2005 1:05 PM alpha said:

I thought sites on cssbeauty has to validate? There are over 200 errors just on the mainpage.

GravatarOn June 5, 2005 11:44 AM A* said:

The blue underline is caused by a missing 'text-decoration: none;' in their css for the a:link

You would have thought they'd see that one straight away with the site testing?

GravatarOn June 5, 2005 1:36 PM Shiven said:

Cool colors. Cool layouts. But a little bit tight on some pages - more margins needed. The thin line coming around meet us is damging otherwise cool layout.

GravatarOn June 6, 2005 5:58 PM Aaron Schaap said:

Thanks for the feedback. For some reason our copy of Firefox doesn't show the line. I'll take care of it tomorrow at work.

As for the validation. Believe me when I say we tried hard. We're using a CMS from Gospelcom.net. Whereas it's a great system - they don't focus on spitting out standard code. There wasn't anything we were able to do but validate our code when we put it into the system.

As for the Architecture, we spent quite a bit of time trying to think of an easier way for people to browse the site.

Glad you all like it :-)

GravatarOn June 7, 2005 11:40 AM pablohart said:

FWIW, A*, we did see it when testing, but there are only so many things you can fix on a limited budget. I didn't know a fix for it and didn't have the time to look.

Thanks for the fix. The text-decoration: none worked when I applied it to the bloggers dl.

GravatarOn June 7, 2005 3:00 PM Preston said:

This is a great-looking site. It really makes me want to read the content. One suggestion I would make is to make the navigation more consistent; it seems as if there are four different themes for it.

Post a comment

Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.

  • Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
  • Personal attacks will be deleted.
  • Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.

Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.

Gravatars are enabled.

Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)

Resources Worth Checking

Recent Forum Discussions

About CSS Beauty

CSSBEAUTY™ is a project focused on providing its audience with a database of well designed CSS based websites from around the world.

Its purpose is to showcase designers' work and to act as a portal to the CSS design community.