Comments
On June 24, 2005 7:35 AM Tim said:The colors are nice. And so the textures. But is creepy :-D The content (for me) is a litte bit confuse, because it mix English with German...
On June 24, 2005 8:12 AM Skipp said:The color scheme is great as is the graphic work. The code seems o be good. Very nice work.
I agree with Tim, the work is a bit scary. But good job anyways!
On June 24, 2005 11:03 AM Dave said:Yeah, there are some sweet textures in the header, great work. Although ... cree-py
On June 24, 2005 1:09 PM Joshua Kendall said:I like the site, on;y wish I could read it.
Nice colors...I will have to explore a little more when I have time.
Oh and Dave, your coming soon graphic has coming spelled wrong.
On June 24, 2005 7:25 PM Khalil said:Great design man and the illustrations are so cool, wish I could read the content though.
On June 24, 2005 7:55 PM Preston said:The textures are very nice and so is the background, but the content is pretty outside-the-box, if you get my drift.
On June 24, 2005 8:33 PM Nate Cavanaugh said:It's hard to find something bad OR something good to say about it.
IMHO, the site is rather bland. His content is great, in the sense of, I love his artwork, however, his website design is rather bland, and uninteresting.
The layout is very uninteresting, and the top header is too over-textured, as is the sidebar.
As an artist and illustrator, I think he has a world of talent, but as a designer, specifically one for the web, I'd say it needs some work.
Then again, what do I know? :)
On June 25, 2005 2:06 AM amanuel said:While I like the design of this site, I am more and more seeing CSS Beauty and other CSS sites alike becoming more of 'Graphics' sites, as that is what their moderators and administrators are kneeling towards. The sites that I have seen recently tend to show more intense graphics, with the CSS being secondary to it and not having too much of an overall effect.
Anyhoo, not intended to be a flamebait, but pointing out the obvious.
On June 26, 2005 10:44 AM Anonymous for a reason :-P said:I'm not a spammer, troll, or flamebaiter.
However, I don't know if this is the person that did this graphic.
http://www.timowuerz.com/news/interview.php
He said that he was only interviewed for book series. I can swear that girl on that graphic is from a hardcore porn photoshoot. I tried to search for the site that I remembered (big m******ls - not going to advertise for them) and the girl (J***ie) and it seems like infringing copyrights. I might be wrong. However, there is exact picture of her poising like that. That is all about that.
Anways, my review for the site is cool and all with the textures and line graphics. I don't like to see a person staring at me. Not fan of the right column graphic/photo.
- On June 26, 2005 3:32 PM amanuel said:
In reply to the above post, i think the guy posted a copy of the magazine in which he was interviewed. If you look at the writings on the pic in question, it has the title of the publication. Maybe that girl you "know" signed a deal with the mag to pose. Or maybe the mag itself infringed.
Anyhoo. The guy who is staring at me is creeping me out too.
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.