Comments
On September 19, 2005 8:22 AM Khalil Waldropt said:That menu is pretty cool, not a fan of the header and the headings though, but the date on the other hand are pretty cool also. I'll give this 7.5/10. That header is just way to loud for the simplicity of the rest of the site, if he kept with more of those sleek lines on the menu I'd bump it to a 8.5.
- "Everyone has an opinion, doesn't mean they are correct"
-Khalil
On September 19, 2005 9:34 AM Webdawson said:Awesome Menu - love it.
On September 19, 2005 10:48 AM Joshua Kendall said:I love it. I just spent 10 minutes there, and if I could of read it, I would still be there.
On September 19, 2005 11:52 AM Dave said:I thought, graphically, it was pleasing however, as a sight as a whole it was rather heavy and slow to navigate.
It's so-so.
On September 19, 2005 2:33 PM Vitaly Friedman said:One of the great navigation menus I've seen so far.
On September 19, 2005 6:43 PM Patrick Robin said:It may be due to the fact that I've not got the language packs installed to let me view the website as it's intended but the site doesn't really grab me too much. I really like the navigation buttons but after that the site seems to fall apart for me. Whilst the layout is quite good there's just too much white for me with not enough to bind it together for my liking.
On September 19, 2005 6:58 PM kevadamson said:Not my cup of tea visually but, by-eck, tis well done. Implements some interesting interaction (text re-sizer, hide show visual, access keys an' all that). Fair play.
On September 19, 2005 7:23 PM Pilok said:Very cool menu. I am not fan of the global design but It looks very personal and that it the most important in a homewebsite.
On September 20, 2005 1:20 AM Andrew said:cool...only comment is there are too many/conflicting fonts. The typefaces used should be more consistant with the logo.
On September 20, 2005 4:38 AM Colin said:Looks great. My only problem is with the loud banner in the middle of the page. The navigation, text-resizing and general attention to detail is well done.
On September 20, 2005 5:29 AM Fender said:my browser not find it ... this is real. http://www.jtf-jp.com ?
On September 20, 2005 9:46 AM General Shelton said:The Menu is well thought out and well coded. However, the rest of the site is too jumbled and its hard to find a section you are looking for. I think some additional colors and more white space is called for...
On September 20, 2005 6:27 PM J. Nguyen said:I like the website. The navigation looks fresh. Love the person's graphics works, too.
On September 21, 2005 10:15 AM Thomas said:I Like the feeling of the menu , very lightwide and transparentlook, although its big.
On September 22, 2005 6:20 AM Aaron said:Yes, I agree with those who say the "header image" - the image below the menu and the content - needs to be revisited, imho. I have 1680x1050, but I'm still irritated when I can see that a site's content starts below the fold for those with 800x600. Just seems like a waste of real estate. I also agree that the menu is trés sexy.
8.5 - assuming there are people out there somewhere who can read the site.
On September 26, 2005 10:42 AM Bobby said:This is a very untidy design, the main body image is huge and the green is just not inviting. It looks like a slam of randomness put together on a digital canvas.
I don't think the nav matches the rest of the site. Revise all those grunge brush effects. This has potential to be a good site but at the moment it is all over the place.
On August 31, 2006 2:33 PM WaltDe said:Keep up the great work on your blog. Best wishes WaltDe
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.