Comments
On April 9, 2006 4:11 AM Andrew said:I don't want to be crude, but that logo type has the distinct appearance of "dick" instead of "click," and that's without trying to hard looking at it. Nice layout, by the way.
On April 9, 2006 8:46 AM Jero said:Haha, yes, now that you mentioned it, it does look like it says "dick" instead of "click". Besides that, I think the layout looks very good even though I'm not a big fan of the blue color they chose for their content part.
On April 9, 2006 11:25 AM David said:I dont know...Not a huge fan of the typography on the home page and throughout the site. Doesnt seem like a cssbeauty worthy site to me.
On April 9, 2006 11:46 AM Nick Cowie said:Got to agree with David, the typography is poor, the photos on the home page do not impress and the logo, the less said the better. Not a cssbeauty site IMHO.
On April 9, 2006 6:51 PM ricky Green said:I like the layout and as jero pointed out it does look like dick, but wait there's more.
There moto is "protect your digital assets"
Dick, assets, WTF?
:P
On April 10, 2006 9:19 AM Marty said:The link on top of document doesn't work.
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.