Comments
On April 30, 2006 5:52 PM Sam said:I'm starting to feel that it's easier for a popular site to get onto CSSBeauty these days than it is for a little known one. Snook's blog is excellent however his new design isn't, especially compared to his old design. Maybe being popular is a factor you take into consideration before placing a site into the gallery?
On April 30, 2006 6:00 PM Alex Giron said:Maybe being popular is a factor you take into consideration before placing a site into the gallery?
I saw the design, I liked it, I listed it... that simple.
being popular has nothing to do with how sites get chosen.
On April 30, 2006 6:07 PM Dave Cardwell said:CSSBEAUTYâ„¢ is a project focused on providing its audience with a database of well designed CSS based websites from around the world.
I'd say Snook's blog is an attractive site, certainly well above average, has strong CSS code, and some interesting features that should be of use to those "in need of inspiration".
If you put it into context relative to the other designs in this gallery I think it's certainly worthy of a place, popular or not.
On April 30, 2006 7:05 PM Anders G said:I see what you mean, Sam, as it is a known fact that many of the widely known designers are featured a lot more than the average hobbyist. But it might be just that - they're widely known, and thus get a better chance of being actually noticed.
On April 30, 2006 8:52 PM Devon said:I totally agree with Sam and Anders on the popularity comments. Don't get me wrong also, his content is great but this design is nothing close to being cssbeauty-worthy, Perhaps im missing something here?
Sorry Snook, love the content but liked your other design much better.
On April 30, 2006 9:24 PM Stenve R said:Contrary to what others have said I think it's a great design, and I love the hidden features.
The bright borders on the comment form are a bit too much, maybe tunning them down would help.
Good work snook, congrats on the reboot.
On April 30, 2006 10:34 PM jasons said:It looks cool but I kinda liked the old one better to be honest.
On April 30, 2006 11:59 PM Derek Punsalan said:I think Snook has an amazing site. It may not have the initial "zing" that his previous layout had [upon first loading the page], but he's managed to hide little bits of trickiness behind each "corner". The disappearing comment form kept me entertained. The added option to toggle contrast is also another great touch.
On May 1, 2006 12:03 AM Darren said:I agree with Sam et al. I read Snook. Honestly though, his content has become a little self-gratuitous since SWSX. His right though, it's his site. But, CSS Beauty worthy...eehh, it's debatable.
On May 1, 2006 2:26 AM Egor said:Nice Work! Can't say I'm a fan of the sub-columns' text-size, however.
On May 1, 2006 4:42 AM Jero said:I agree with Sam and others. I don't like the combinations colors and the contrast is too high. Nevertheless, it's a nice design, but as some others already concluded; not really worthy of being listed here.
On September 19, 2006 3:33 PM kieren said:I like it!! Good Job!
On October 15, 2006 3:27 PM Duk said:Normall web layout
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.