Comments
On January 17, 2006 2:56 AM Pilok said:Very nice website. The wood background combined with the brown and green colour is great!
But, isn't there a small layout bug with the footer (the space between the main part, the purple line and the footer)?
Beside that, they have great works (the mercurio logo for example).
On January 17, 2006 7:00 AM Robert said:@Pilok: i don't think it's a bug. the space between this two parts is nearly the same in the navigation. btw: i like the space above the footer.
I really like the colors, the sapes, the design. the artwork itself is great, imho the 'big' images in the portfolio are to small (resulting from the website layout) all in all the website is 'not wide enough'.
On January 17, 2006 7:26 AM James Paden said:Wow, I thnk that's one of the best new sites I've seen in a long time. Really refreshing.
On January 17, 2006 7:42 AM Jason said:I like the design itself, but it's too anorexic looking on my 1280x1024 res being 300px wide.
On January 17, 2006 11:15 AM Trevor said:I like the design alot! but... I am with Jason on this one. My resolution is 1440x900 and it looks even more anorexic being 300px wide.
On January 17, 2006 11:16 AM Lisa Labelle said:I too agree with Jason, and I would love to see a wider version. The colors are so striking and the overall effect is breathtaking.
On January 17, 2006 12:31 PM José & Pati said:Thanks all you guys for your comments. We are very pleased.
Definitely, we are going to make our web site layout wider for its second version ;)
On January 17, 2006 4:09 PM tirins.play said:This site is not that hot really. Skinny design, transition of woodgrain to gradient has color/tonal issues, and navigation bar doesn't tie the two halves together. So so, at best.
On January 17, 2006 6:57 PM kevadamson said:- Great colours
- Fantastic attention to detail
- Original and brave design
- Nice simple portfolio gui- Not keen on logo rollover - needed?
- Not keen on wood effect - flat colour?Thumbs up!
- On January 17, 2006 7:32 PM Pilok said:
@Robert: humm... indeed, you are right but I don't know, I think it would be better if the footer stick to the body of the site... Anyway, thumbs up as kevadamson said... this is a very nice website.
On January 18, 2006 2:20 AM Nathan said:I like it for the attention to detail, personally its not my cup of tea but it has plenty of merits.
Raves:
Attention to detail.Interesting colour scheme (apart from the wood grain).
Portfolio layout, nice and simple and you don't have to think too hard to work it out.
Rants:
The wood grain effect feels a little out of place with the rest of the design.I'm not sure the "avant-garde" style font works all that well with the rest of the page fonts?
I agree with the "anorexia" statement, some width would help this site on larger monitors.
Other than that, very interesting work.
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.