Comments
On April 18, 2007 1:56 AM Heart said:will! the site is simple.
thats the only thing good about it.
there is nothing eye catching or new about the design.
the XHTML doesn't validate, and the CSS has like 22 errors.
i don't know about you but the sIFR is not working all that good for me some text in some pages is not readable.but the ties looks nice in there! i guess thats the point behind the site :D
On April 18, 2007 2:35 AM JoeRo said:Awesome site
On April 18, 2007 2:00 PM Adrian said:I'm starting to believe someone is getting money to list sites.
On April 18, 2007 2:11 PM Alex Giron said:yep, I'm getting all of it.
On April 18, 2007 8:01 PM Seth Aldridge said:I want some!
On April 19, 2007 8:24 AM Daniel said:Does anyone know where you can get an example of the java/php script like they use on this site for the pop-up screen for the images on the right on almost every page?
Thx!
On April 19, 2007 9:57 AM Ash said:well i liked it
On April 19, 2007 5:33 PM Thame said:Haha, great comment Alex :D
This is a great selection. You can't really go wrong with Garamond and Trajan, but it's a really well-designed website.
On April 19, 2007 11:30 PM Colin said:I think it's great. It represents a new shift in creating web sites that feel more like beautiful print pieces.
And, Thame, you can go wrong with Garamond and Tajan. I've seen it on several occasions ;)
On April 20, 2007 11:29 AM vepa said:Yep nothing special, simple website.
PS: It must be good money Alex. :D
On April 20, 2007 12:08 PM Stormin said:Nice and clean, love the old black and white pictures.
- On April 21, 2007 12:53 AM Colin said:
I wonder if the people here saying there is 'nothing special' about this web site are longing for some wet floor on the images and fat diagonal stripes in the background. And what's with these serif fonts? Trebuchet would be much better...
On April 21, 2007 12:57 AM Min Tran said:I can say that this site is one of the greatest sites that featured on CSSBeauty for a while.
There're a few validation errors here and there; but the design is really great, simple, well laid-out, excellent use of photos, typography,....
On April 22, 2007 4:47 PM Alessia said:IMO this site is simple but elegant and a little bit retro style. Really liked the way you can enlarge pictures. Very good job! ;)
On April 23, 2007 9:35 AM yaka said:Thanks all for your comments!!!
I'm the web developer of this site,
I fixed XHTML validation errors, but 22 css errors are in the
lightbox's and smoothgallery's css files, and i'm studying how to fix them. :)To Daniel:
here's the links to your questions:For the home page gallery:
http://smoothgallery.jondesign.net/For product's image's gallery (images on right):
http://www.kreatura.hu/pyro/clearbox/Again thanks to you all!!
Bye!
On May 16, 2007 3:46 PM Eric said:I like the overall structure of the site. Nice typography and slide show.
Post a comment
Note: The author reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.
- Foul and offensive language will be edited or deleted.
- Personal attacks will be deleted.
- Advertising or spam will not be tolerated.
Formatting: Linebreaks will be converted automatically. Basic HTML tags allowed: a href, strong, em, ol, ul, li, blockquote, code, acronym title, abbr title.
Gravatars are enabled.